2022 Speedo Wintertime Juniors West– Day 3 Finals Live Wrap-up

December 10, 2022

2022 Speedo Wintertime Junior Championships– West

Friday Finals Warm Sheet

Friday evening’s finals session in Austin will certainly include the 400 IM, 100 butterfly, 200 cost-free, 100 breaststroke, 100 backstroke, and also 200 freestyle relays.

Women’ 400 Backyard Person Assortment– Finals

  • Meet Document: 4:00.66, Katie Grimes (2021 )
  • Swimming Pool Document: 3:57.03, Ella Eastin (2019 )
  • 13-14 NAG Document: 4:06.95, Kayla Han (2022 )
  • 15-16 NAG Document: 4:00.62, Dagny Knutson (2008 )
  • 17-18 NAG Document: 3:58.40, Ella Eastin (2016 )

Leading 8:

  1. Katie Grimes (SAND)– 3:57.02 MEET DOCUMENT, SWIMMING POOL DOCUMENT, 15-16 NAG
  2. Asia Kozan (MVN)– 4:07.27
  3. Kayla Han (RMDA)– 4:07.77
  4. Abby O’Sullivan (MVN)– 4:14.97
  5. Katie McCarthy (EDI)– 4:15.19
  6. Caroline Bricker (PPA)– 4:15.42
  7. Teagan Steinmetz (DSA)– 4:17.83
  8. Elise Clift (MAC)– 4:20.78

Katie Grimes of Sandpipers of Nevada damaged her previous lifetime-best time in the 400 IM, damaging the 4-minute obstacle for the very first time with an impressive 3:57.02. She decreased her very own Winter months Juniors satisfy document by 3.64 secs and also damaged Dagny Knutson’s nationwide age document for 15-16 women (4:00.62) that has actually meant 14 years.

Grimes was out swiftly, clocking a 53.5 butterfly leadoff, taking half a 2nd off her ideal time. She adhered to with a 58.5 on the back and also 1:11.1 on the bust, prior to bringing it house in 53.6. Grimes is currently the 4th-fastest American in background; hers was the # 5 American efficiency all-time. Her divides were:

  • Fly– 25.10/ 28.49
  • Back– 29.58/ 29.04
  • Bust– 35.54/ 35.60
  • Free– 27.36/ 26.31

Behind Grimes, Caroline Bricker remained in 2nd area via the butterfly leg, yet Asia Kozan took control of on backstroke. Kayla Han relocated right into 3rd area in advance of Bricker on the breaststroke and also fought Kozan for 2nd area over the last 100 lawns. Kozan had a half-second lead on Han that she never ever allowed up on, and also end up in 2nd area with a PB of 4:07.27. Han completed simply off her ideal time with a 4:07.77.

Boys’ 400 Backyard Person Assortment– Finals

  • Meet Document: 3:42.22, Maximus Williamson (2021 )
  • Swimming Pool Document: 3:34.50, Chase Kalisz (2014 )
  • 13-14 NAG Document: 3:51.46, Thomas Heilman (2022 )
  • 15-16 NAG Document: 3:42.08, Michael Phelps (2002 )
  • 17-18 NAG Document: 3:35.27, Carson Foster (2020 )

Leading 8:

  1. Maximus Williamson (LAC)– 3:39.83 MEET DOCUMENT, 15-16 NAG
  2. Cooper Lucas (LAC)– 3:42.09
  3. Anthony Laurito (AQUA)– 3:45.76
  4. Diego Nosack (THSC)– 3:46.24
  5. Humberto Najera (EVO)– 3:47.55
  6. Luke Ellis (SAND)– 3:47.68
  7. Luke Stibrich (BTA)– 3:58.75
  8. Lance Johnson (EBSC)– 3:48.78

Maximus Williamson of Shore Aquatic Club decreased his very own satisfy document from in 2015 and also downed Michael Phelps’ last 15-16 nationwide age document in one dropped swoop, clocking a 3:39.83 to win the 400 IM by 3.7 secs. His colleague Cooper Lucas was out initially on the butterfly with 49.66, leading by.15 on the fly-to-back turn. Yet Williamson outsplit him by 2 secs on the backstroke. Lucas shut the space to 1.1 secs on the breaststroke prior to Williamson removed on the freestyle, getting home in 50.5. The winning divides were:

  • Fly– 23.02/ 26.79
  • Back– 26.94/ 27.15
  • Bust– 32.64/ 32.77
  • Free– 25.60/ 24.92

Aquastar’s Anthony Laurito went down one more 2.8 secs, after his 6-second renovation today, to complete on the 3rd action of the platform with 3:45.76.

Women’ 100 Backyard Butterfly– Finals

  • Meet Document: 51.73, Regan Smith (2016 )
  • Swimming Pool Document: 49.26, Louise Hansson (2019 )
  • 13-14 NAG Document: 50.64, Claire Curzan (2019 )
  • 15-16 NAG Document: 49.51, Claire Curzan (2021 )
  • 17-18 NAG Document: 49.24, Claire Curzan (2022 )

Leading 8:

  1. Emma Kern (AQJT)– 52.23
  2. Maggie Schalow (NOVA)– 52.56
  3. Kelsey Zhang (PASA)– 56.62
  4. Ava Whitaker (AMBU)– 52.68
  5. Kayla Fu (FCST)– 52.86
  6. Alana Berlin (SSTY)– 53.09
  7. Lexi Greenhawt (TOPS)– 53.34
  8. Clare Watson (BC)– 53.84

Emma Kern from Aquajets took one more 2nd off her brand-new PB, developed in prelims today, and also bordered Novaquatics’ Maggie Schalow, 52.23 to 52.56, for the 100 fly win. Kern and also Schalow transformed with each other at the 50 wall surface with matching 24-flats yet Kern was three-tenths much faster on the back fifty percent.

Kelsey Zhang of Palo Alto Stanford Aquatics, that had actually remained in 7th area at the middle, returned with the fastest 2nd 50 in the area (27.7) to complete 3rd total in 52.62. She bordered Ava Whitaker of Ambush Swim Group by.06 to rack up the bronze medal.

Boys’ 100 Backyard Butterfly– Finals

  • Meet Document: 45.46, Ryan Hoffer (2015 )
  • Swimming Pool Document: 44.06, Joseph Education (2017 )
  • 13-14 NAG Document: 45.81, Thomas Heilman (2021 )
  • 15-16 NAG Document: 45.62, Luca Urlando (2018 )
  • 17-18 NAG Document: 44.75, Aiden Hayes (2022 )

Leading 8:

  1. Jacob Wimberly (TFA)– 46.26
  2. Hayden Bellotti (FCST)– 46.44
  3. David Schmitt (EVO)– 46.86
  4. ( connection) Simon Lins (PST)/ Colin Geer (GWSC)– 46.92
  5. Lance Swanepoel (DSMY)– 47.33
  6. Ethan Harrington (PASA)– 47.51
  7. Carter Ruthven (LOVE)– 47.76

Jacob Wimberly of Texas Ford and also First Swarm’s Hayden Bellotti, took care of to retreat from a really congested area at the 25 wall surface to complete almost half a body in advance of the area. Bellotti was in advance by a tenth at the 50 wall surface with 21.22 yet Wimberly returned in 24.9 to get hold of the gold with 46.26. Bellotti took care of to hold back a fast-charging David Schmitt of Development Competing, whose 2nd 50 was the fastest of the last (24.86) and also area 2nd in 46.44. Wimberly and also Bellotti, that entered the satisfy rated 5th and also 15th, specifically, completed the day 1.5 and also 2 secs much faster than their access times.

Golden West’s Colin Geer and also Piedmont Swim Group’s Simon Lins connected for 4th area with 46.92, the just various other sub-47s of the evening.

Women’ 200 Backyard Freestyle– Finals

  • Meet Document: 1:40.78, Bella Sims (2022 )
  • Swimming Pool Document: 1:40.26, Mallory Comerford (2019 )
  • 13-14 NAG Document: 1:44.10, Sippy Woodhead (1979 )
  • 15-16 NAG Document: 1:42.03, Katie Ledecky (2013 )
  • 17-18 NAG Document: 1:40.31, Missy Franklin (2014 )

Leading 8:

  1. Bella Sims (SAND)– 1:41.10
  2. Katie Grimes (SAND)– 1:43.83
  3. Claire Weinstein (SAND)– 1:43.93
  4. Teagan O’Dell (MVN)– 1:43.94
  5. Bailey Hartman (CROW)– 1:44.56
  6. Macky Hodges (SAND)– 1:45.69
  7. Madeleine Herbert (TRA)– 1:45.76
  8. Madi Mintenko (PPA)– 1:45.93

Bella Sims led a Sandpipers move of the platform in the 200 freestyle last, going 1:41.10 to win with her second-best time ever before. She had actually developed a brand-new satisfy document in the 200 cost-free on Wednesday evening with her leadoff leg of 1:40.78 on SAND’s 800 cost-free relay, and also while she dropped simply except that time in tonight’s specific last, she controlled the race from beginning to end and also won by 2.73 secs.

Sims was hostile from the beginning, heading out in 23.3 as she carried Wednesday. While she returned in 26.0, her center 100 had to do with three-tenths slower. Her relative divides are:

  • 38/ 25.40/ 26.28/ 26.04– 1:41.10
  • 35/ 25.26/ 26.12/ 26.05– 1:40.78

Objective Viejo’s Teagan O’Dell did her ideal to separate the SAND hegemony. She kept 2nd area at the 50, 100, and also 150 wall surfaces yet lost to both Katie Grimes and also Claire Weinstein over the last 50 lawns. Simply hardly, though; Weinstein just bordered her by.01 and also Grimes was simply.10 in advance of Weinstein.

Boys’ 200 Backyard Freestyle– Finals

Leading 8:

  1. Maximus Williamson (LAC)– 1:33.60
  2. Rex Maurer (ROSE)– 1:33.69
  3. Keaton Jones (NEP)– 1:34.31
  4. Chase Mueller (FST)– 1:34.66
  5. Cooper Lucas (LAC)– 1:35.53
  6. Ian Pickles (NEP)– 1:36.36
  7. Jones Lambert (LSC)– 1:36.90
  8. Jeremy Kelly (NTRO)– 1:37.90

Like Sims, Maximus Williamson had actually damaged the satisfy document in the 200 cost-free on Wednesday evening leading off the Shore Aquatic Club 800 cost-free relay. He was half a 2nd slower tonight, yet to be reasonable, he had not swim a record-breaking 400 IM prior to his relay on Wednesday.

It was Rose Dish’s Rex Maurer that took it out initially in 21.78, turning in advance of Keaton Jones, Cooper Lucas, Jeremy Kelly, Ian Pickles, and also Williamson. Jones took control of the lead at the 100 with Maurer, Lucas, Pickles, and also Williamson in his wake.

Maurer assaulted the 3rd 50 with the very same fierceness he carried the last 100 of the 500 cost-free last evening (which he won with a fulfill document of 4:12.33). Jones had to do with.16 behind him. Williamson switched on the turbo jets and also split 23.84 and also 23.21 on his 3rd and also 4th 50s to relocate from 5th at the 100 to 3rd at the 150 to initially at the touch. Placing his head below the flags to the wall surface, he simply touched out Maurer for his 2nd win of the evening. It was Williamson’s second-best efficiency and also Maurer’s PB, as they had actually entered the meet 1:34.97 (Williamson) and also 1:34.59 (Maurer).

Women’ 100 Backyard Breaststroke– Finals

  • Meet Document: 58.94, Zoie Hartman (2018 )
  • Swimming Pool Document: 55.73, Lily King (2019 )
  • 13-14 NAG Document: 1:00.02, Alexis Wenger (2015 )
  • 15-16 NAG Document: 58.19, Alex Walsh (2017 )
  • 17-18 NAG Document: 57.54, Lydia Jacoby (2022 )

Leading 8:

  1. Lydia Jacoby (TEX)– 57.76 MEET DOCUMENT
  2. Piper Enge (BC)– 59.61
  3. Raya Mellott (CROW)– 59.74
  4. Gillian Tu (BC)– 1:00.02
  5. Bella Brito (CITI)– 1:01.12
  6. Sarah Bennetts (DART)– 1:01.48
  7. Kinley Wigle (BEND)– 1:01.87
  8. Hannah O’Leary (AQTX)– 1:02.05

Olympic gold champion Lydia Jacoby, swimming in her brand-new house swimming pool as a fresher at the College of Texas, won the 100 bust title with a brand-new satisfy document of 57.76. She was simply off her life time ideal of 57.54 from recently’s Minnesota Invite, where she was available in 2nd to her Texas colleague Anna Elendt and also established the united state nationwide age document for 17-18 women.

Tonight, she headed out in 27.08 and also was up by over half a body size at the midway mark. Bellevue Club’s Gillian Tu was the only various other sub-28 at the 50 wall surface; she transformed 2nd with 27.77. Jacoby billed house in 30.6 to win by 2 body sizes. Tu diminished speed on the 2nd fifty percent of the race, and also both Piper Enge, her Bellevue Club colleague, and also Raya Mellott of Crow Canyon, surpassed her with their 31.3 s and also gained areas on the platform with 59.61 and also 59.74, specifically.

Boys’ 100 Backyard Breaststroke– Finals

  • Meet Document: 52.21, Michael Andrew (2015 )
  • Swimming Pool Document: 49.85, Ian Finnerty (2019 )
  • 13-14 NAG Document: 53.06, Reece Whitley (2014 )
  • 15-16 NAG Document: 51.75, Michael Andrew (2015 )
  • 17-18 NAG Document: 51.16, Reece Whitley (2018 )

Leading 8:

  1. Nate Germonprez (ISWM)– 52.73
  2. Daniel Li (ROSE)– 52.92
  3. Logan Brown (FCST)– 53.06
  4. Joshua Corn (FST)– 53.30
  5. Charlie Egeland (AQJT)– 53.85
  6. Jake Eccleston (LOVE)– 54.31
  7. Kaden Guzman (ISWM)– 54.32
  8. Andrew Zou (TXLA)– 54.43

Nate Germonprez from Inspire Swim Group repelled a solid difficulty from Rose Dish’s Daniel Li to win the 100 bust last in 52.73. He was simply off the 52.59 PB he had actually swum in prelims, yet still won by two-tenths. Li damaged 53 secs for the very first time, taking around.8 off his seed time with his second-place surface of 52.92. First Swarm’s Logan Brown finished the platform with a PB of 53.06.

Women’ 100 Backyard Backstroke– Finals

  • Meet Document: 50.58, Regan Smith (2018 )
  • Swimming Pool Document: 49.18, Beata Nelson (2019 )
  • 13-14 NAG Document: 51.03, Levenia Sim (2021 )
  • 15-16 NAG Document: 50.03, Claire Curzan (2021 )
  • 17-18 NAG Document: 49.52, Claire Curzan (2022 )

Leading 8:

  1. Bella Sims (SAND)– 50.53 MEET DOCUMENT
  2. Teagan O’Dell (MVN)– 51.86
  3. Emma Kern (AQJT)– 52.17
  4. Poise Rabb (AQJT)– 52.79
  5. Alana Berlin (SSTY)– 52.85
  6. Charlotte Wilson (TOPS)– 52.89
  7. Macky Hodges (SAND)– 53.58
  8. Adriana Smith (OAPB)– 54.03

Bella Sims went down one more 1.6 secs off her 52.1 PB from today’s heats up to win the 100 backstroke with a fulfill document of 50.53. Having actually entered the satisfy rated 6th with 53.26, she is leaving 2.7 secs much faster and also currently rates # 7 all-time on the listing of fastest American swimmers in the 17-18 age.

Sims controlled the race from beginning to end. She went out with 24.88, adhered to very closely by Aquajets’ Emma Kern– fresh off her win in the 100 fly– that turned in 25.0 at the 50. Sims additionally had the fastest 2nd fifty percent, getting home in 25.6. Objective Viejo’s Teagan O’Dell went 26.5 on her 2nd fifty percent to relocate from 3rd to 2nd at the surface. O’Dell took.08 off her seed time to clock a PB of 51.86 for the silver medal. Kern held back Poise Rabb to put 3rd with 52.17.

Boys’ 100 Backyard Backstroke– Finals

  • Meet Document: 45.58, Ryan Hoffer (2015 )
  • Swimming Pool Document: 43.66, Dean Farris (2019 )
  • 13-14 NAG Document: 47.44, Daniel Diehl (2020 )
  • 15-16 NAG Document: 45.60, Anthony Grimm (2019 )
  • 17-18 NAG Document: 44.63, Ryan Murphy (2014 )

Leading 8:

  1. Maximus Williamson (LAC)– 46.90
  2. Luke Logue (AQJT)– 46.96
  3. Keaton Jones (NEP)– 46.97
  4. Chase Mueller (FST)– 47.49
  5. Marre Gattnar (NBA)– 47.58
  6. Max Cahill (ROSE)– 47.65
  7. Edward Huang (CDST)– 47.73
  8. Jeremy Kelly (NTRO)– 47.75

It was nearly also great to be real. Simply when you could have been forgiven for believing 3 A finals might be a little much, also for Shore’s Maximus Williamson, he did it once again: Williamson won his 3rd race of the evening and also his 2nd come-from-behind thriller.

Luke Loge of Aquajets established the speed from the beginning, turning initially at the 25 wall surface and also initially at the 50. Williamson was just a tenth behind, though, and also he outsplit Logue over the 2nd fifty percent by.2 to squeeze out the win, 46.90 to 46.96. Keaton Jones from Swim Neptune had the fastest back fifty percent of any individual in the last, getting home in a blistering 23.86 to almost even-split his race. He completed in 3rd area with 46.97, simply one hundredth behind Logue.

Women’ 4 × 50 Backyard Freestyle Relay

  • West Meet Document– 1:30.09, SwimMAC Carolina (A Marsh, C Lappin, J Merritt, E Brown) (2015 )
  • Wintertime Juniors Meet Document– 1:29.04, Chelsea Piers Aquatic Club (B Semenuk, S Moore, M Parker, K Douglass) (2018 )
  • Swimming Pool Document– 1:24.55, The Golden State (Murphy, McLaughlin, Bilquist, Weitzeil)
  • 13-14 NAG Document: 1:33.30, TAC Titans (2019 )
  • 15-16 NAG Document: 1:30.99, Virginia Gators (2017 )
  • 17-18 NAG Document: 1:29.69, Nashville Aquatic Club (2020 )

Leading 8:

  1. ( connection) Sandpipers of Nevada/ Objective Viejo Nadadores– 1:29.35 WEST FULFILL DOCUMENT
  2. Nitro– 1:31.54
  3. Bellevue Club– 1:31.72
  4. Denver Hilltoppers– 1:32.35
  5. Shore Aquatic– 1:32.37
  6. Palo Alto Stanford– 1:32.62
  7. Alamo Location– 1:33.11

Of all the thrilling races we enjoyed this evening, warm 2 of the 200 cost-free relays could have been one of the most interesting. Sandpipers and also Objective Viejo, fielding 8 of the fastest young adults in the nation, fought for 8 laps and also generated a connection.

Bella Sims opened up with 22.41 for SAND. She was adhered to by Katie Grimes (22.18 ), Macky Hodges (22.41 ), and also Claire Weinstein (22.18 ).

Objective Viejo opted for Teia Salvino for the leadoff; she clocked a 22.66 to stay within half a body of Sims. Asia Kozan went 22.20 to bring the shortage to.10. Gracyn Aquino blew up a 22.53 and also handed off to Teagan O’Dell that secured with a 21.96 to capture Weinstein.

Both groups quit the clock at 1:29.35, damaging the West satisfy document and also directly missing out on the 15-18 nationwide age document of 1:29.04, established by Chelsea Piers in 2018. (As both quartets included participant of the 15-16 and also 17-18 age, neither was qualified for either of those 2 NAG age groups.)

Boys’ 4 × 50 Backyard Freestyle Relay

  • West Meet Document– 1:19.03, Bolles College Sharks (C Dressel, S Condorelli, E Goossen, J Education) (2012 )
  • Wintertime Juniors Meet Document– 1:19.03, Bolles College Sharks (C Dressel, S Condorelli, E Goossen, J Education) (2012 )
  • Swimming Pool Document– 1:14.46, The Golden State (Sendyk, Hoffer, Jensen, Seliskar)
  • 13-14 NAG Document: 1:25.63, Scottsdale Aquatic Club (2013 )
  • 15-16 NAG Document: 1:22.10, Rose Dish Aquatics (2021 )
  • 17-18 NAG Document: 1:18.92, Spartan Aquatic Club (2021 )

Leading 8:

  1. Nitro– 1:19.87
  2. Shore Aquatic– 1:20.18
  3. Rose Dish– 1:20.23
  4. Swim Neptune– 1:20.43
  5. North Bay– 1:20.96
  6. Palo Alto Stanford– 1:21.40
  7. Texas Ford Aquatics– 1:21.54
  8. Irvine Novaquatics– 1:21.76

Nitro Swimming’s Sonny Wang (19.90 ), Jeremy Kelly (19.82 ), Oliver Rowe (20.17 ), and also Kelson Flynn (19.98) integrated for 1:19.87 to win the 200 cost-free relay in advance of Shore Aquatic Club (River Paulk, Maximus Williamson, Max Hatcher, and also Cooper Lucas) and also Rose Dish Aquatics (Rex Maurer, Jonathan Gim, Nathan Kim, and also Athan Boutakidis).

Palo Alto Stanford’s Ethan Harrington had the fastest leadoff 50 with 19.59, a tenth off his winning time in the specific occasion final last evening. The fastest split flying beginning split in the warm came from Williamson, that went 19.46 on Shore’s 2nd leg to draw almost despite Nitro.

Women’ Group Rankings– With Occasion 23

  1. Sandpipers of Nevada 360
  2. Objective Viejo Nadadores 294
  3. Bellevue Club Swim Group 185
  4. Aquajets Swim Group 149
  5. Crow Canyon Sharks 138
  6. Univ of Denver Hilltoppers 134
  7. Palo Alto Stanford Aquatics 104
  8. Irvine Novaquatics 69
  9. Nitro Swimming 67
  10. Alamo Location Aquatic Organization 62
  11. Mansfield Aquatic Club 58
  12. Pikes Height Sports 57
  13. Shore Aquatic Club 56
  14. Schroeder YMCA Swim/Dive Group 55
  15. ( connection) Academy Bullets Swim Club/ Seattle Metropolitan Aquatic C 49
  16. Rose Dish Aquatics 39
  17. Group Rebel Aquatics 37
  18. Highlands Cattle Ranch Aquatics 33
  19. La Mirada Armada 29
  20. Lake Nation Swim Group 28
  21. Orinda Aquatics 27
  22. Sierra Marlins Swim Group 26
  23. Elmbrook Swim Club 25
  24. King Aquatic Club 24
  25. Very First Swarm Swim Group 23
  26. ( connection) Realm Swim Club/ College of Texas 20
  27. ( connection) Coastline Cities Swimming/ Edina Swim Club 19
  28. Scottsdale Aquatic Club 17
  29. ( connection) Ambush Swimming/ Cor Swimming 15
  30. Hinsdale Swim Club 14
  31. Dart Swimming 13
  32. ( connection) Bend Swim Club/ Eclipse Aquatics 12
  33. ( connection) Aquatex Swim & & Water Polo Group/ Longhorn Aquatics 11
  34. Flatiron Swimming 10
  35. Metroplex Aquatics 9
  36. ( connection) Rancho San Dieguito/ Cody Kountry Aquatic Group/ Lake Oswego Swim Club 7
  37. ( connection) Loveland Swim Club/ Magnolia Aquatic Club/ Dallas Mustangs 6
  38. ( connection) The Woodlands Swim Group/ Mako Aquatics/ Wolverine Aquatics Club 5
  39. Front Array Barracudas Swim 4
  40. Dads Club Swim Group 3
  41. ( connection) Burlingame Aquatics/ Clovis Swim Club/ Waterfront Aquatics Organization/ Bozeman Barracudas Swim Club/ Undercurrent Swim Group 2
  42. Wasatch Front Fish Market 1

Boys’ Group Rankings– With Occasion 24

  1. Shore Aquatic Club 324
  2. Rose Dish Aquatics 273
  3. Swim Neptune 182
  4. Nitro Swimming 174.5
  5. Texas Ford Aquatics 118
  6. Aquajets Swim Group 115
  7. North Bay Aquatics 112
  8. Palo Alto Stanford Aquatics 94
  9. Development Competing Club 90
  10. Foothills Swim Group 88
  11. Scottsdale Aquatic Club 72
  12. Very First Swarm Swim Group 56.5
  13. Irvine Novaquatics 52
  14. Inspire Swim Group 49
  15. ( connection) Longhorn Aquatics/ Seattle Metropolitan Aquatic 48
  16. Dads Club Swim Group 46
  17. Blue Trend Aquatics 44
  18. ( connection) Sandpipers of Nevada/ Aquastar 34
  19. Loveland Swim Club 33
  20. ( connection) Coronado Swim– Group Elite/ Tualatin Hills Swim Club 29
  21. Bend Swim Club 27
  22. Golden West Swim Club 26.5
  23. College of Texas 26
  24. Lubbock Swim Club 25
  25. Piedmont Swim Group 23.5
  26. ( connection) Elmbrook Swim Club/ Greater Des Moines YMCA 20
  27. Lake Oswego Swim Club 17
  28. The Golden State Dolphin Swim Group 15.5
  29. Metroplex Aquatics 14
  30. ( connection) Magnolia Aquatic Club/ The Swim Group 13
  31. Greater Omaha Aquatics 10
  32. ( connection) Gold Medal Swim Club/ QuickSilver 9
  33. Crow Canyon Sharks 7.5
  34. ( connection) King Marlin Swim Club/ Alpha Aquatics 7
  35. ( connection) Swim Streamline at Northampton/ Glacier Swim Club 6
  36. ( connection) Streamline Aquatics/ Ames Cyclone Aquatics Club 5
  37. ( connection) The Woodlands Swim Group/ Walnut Creek Aquabears 4
  38. ( connection) Oregon Neighborhood Swim Club/ Livermore Aquacowboys 3
  39. ( connection) Iolani Swim Club/ Alamo Location Aquatic Organization/ Undercurrent Swim Group 2
  40. ( connection) Chicago Wolfpack Aquatic Club/ Glenbrook Senior High School Area 1

See also  2022 Boca Raton Dish forecast, chances, lines: Freedom vs. Toledo choices, best choices from tried and tested design