James S. Brady Press Briefing Room
1:43 P.M. EDT
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Good afternoon, all people.
Q Good afternoon.
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Sorry for a really lengthy two minutes. Apologize for that. (Laughter.) I’m conscious — I do know, I do know. Apologies.
Okay. Tomorrow, President Biden and First — the First Woman will journey to Fort Myers, Florida, to reaffirm his dedication to supporting the individuals of Florida as they recuperate and rebuild from the devastating storm. Whereas there, the President will meet with small-business house owners and native residents impacted by Hurricane Ian and thank the federal, state, and native officers working across the clock to supply lifesaving help, restore energy, distribute meals and water, eradicating particles, and start rebuilding efforts.
Governor DeSantis, the FEMA Administrator Deanne Criswell, and different state and native officers may even present the President with an operational briefing on the present response and restoration efforts
This morning, President Biden spoke with President Zelenskyy to underscore that the USA won’t ever acknowledge Russia’s purported annexation of Ukrainian territory and can proceed to help Ukraine because it defends itself from Russian aggression.
President Biden knowledgeable President Zelenskyy that the USA is offering a brand new $625 million safety help bundle to Ukraine as they proceed to defend their nation from Russia’s invasion.
Along with our allies and companions, the USA has been delivering an unprecedented quantity of weapons and gear that Ukraine’s power — forces are uti- — using very effectively, together with to retake their territory that has been seized illegally by Russia.
This safety help bundle is the twenty second utilization of Presidential — Presidential Drawdown Authorities for Ukraine by the Biden administration, and we thank Congress for offering the extra authorities within the persevering with decision to make this doable.
Right now’s bundle contains 4 HIMARS, 32 Howitzers, 200 mine-resistant autos, and a whole bunch of hundreds of rounds of artillery and mortar ammunition.
All through this yr, the USA has rallied the world to help the individuals of Ukraine as they defend their freedom and democracy towards Russian aggression. As we’re demonstrating once more right this moment, the USA will proceed to supply Ukraine with key capabilities to fulfill their evolving battlefield necessities.
Additionally this morning, as you’ll have seen, Micron introduced that it’s going to make investments $20 billion this decade and as much as $100 billion over the subsequent 20 years in chips manufacturing in Upstate New York.
This announcement is simply the most recent historic funding in America spurred by President Biden’s financial plan and his dedication to rebuilding American manufacturing.
Micron’s multibillion-dollar funding in American chipmaking will strengthen our nation’s financial system and create as much as tens of hundreds of good-paying jobs. The truth is, Micron estimates they are going to pay a mean wage of greater than $100,000 per yr.
That is the most recent in a sequence of historic enterprise investments throughout the nation, from New York to Ohio, Idaho, Arizona, North Carolina, and extra. They usually present the worth within the President’s work to rebuild our infrastructure and provide chains right here at residence in order that we’re creating jobs and bringing down costs over time by making extra in America.
Right now marks 100 days for the reason that Supreme Court docket’s Dobbs determination, and President Biden and Vice President Harris are convening the second assembly of the President’s Process Pressure on Reproductive Healthcare Entry.
This morning, we launched a report from Jen Klein, who directs the Workplace of Gender Coverage Council, to the
Vice President and Vice President on the onslaught of radical and harmful actions from Republican officers for the reason that Dobbs determination. That features, after all, Senator Graham’s proposed nationwide abortion ban and, in Arizona, a courtroom determination to reinstate an excessive abortion ban that sends Arizona — Arizona ladies again to 1864.
Because of these actions, hundreds of thousands of girls are going through obstacles to crucial healthcare. And docs and nurses are going through legal penalties, together with being thrown in jail, for offering that important healthcare.
These excessive abortion bans even have penalties that reach past abortion, together with reviews of girls being denied prescriptions at pharmacies to deal with miscarriage and circumstances like arthritis and most cancers; and threats to contraception, together with for school college students as nicely.
In right this moment’s taskforce assembly, the President and Vice President will hear straight from healthcare suppliers throughout the nation concerning the impression that abortion bans are having on their work. And they’re going to even be clear that the one technique to absolutely defend a girl’s proper to decide on is for Congress to behave by codifying Roe into legislation.
Lastly, a observe on junk charges. Final week, on the White Home Competitors Council assembly, President Biden put a highlight on so-called “junk charges.” He defined that too typically firms impose hidden or shock charges that forestall clients from seeing the complete worth of what they’re shopping for and hit probably the most weak People the toughest.
The President highlighted progress that businesses have already made to handle these charges, which can decrease prices for American households by over $3 billion this yr.
And we’re happy to share that the Biden-Harris administration has now delivered much more outcomes for shoppers. The Shopper Monetary Safety Bureau issued a brand new order requiring Areas Financial institution to pay almost $200 million for unlawful, shock overdraft charges, together with refunding $141 million to shoppers, paying $50 million penalty, and stopping the unlawful fees going ahead.
With that, Colleen, do you wish to kick us off?
Q Certain. Thanks. Has the White Home given any extra thought to a public well being emergency relating to ladies’s reproductive well being, particularly because the, form of, results of abortion bans lengthen past abortion into miscarriage and different elements of girls’s reproductive well being?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: We don’t have something to announce right now. However as you — as you’re conscious, we now have made this a precedence, the President and the Vice President, particularly whereas we’re seeing these excessive legal guidelines. We see that the nationwide bans from Republicans — the President and Vice President are doing every part of their energy to guard ladies looking for abortion: their proper to journey to states that present care, their proper to remedy and contraception, and their proper to affected person privateness.
Look, we’ve taken a spread of actions to make sure entry. As you understand, we’ve taken some govt actions very early on. And right this moment you’ll hear from the President of [sic] Vice President — and Vice President on what the extra actions that we are going to be taking.
However we now have been very clear — you heard that in my — to start with of the briefing and what I simply mentioned: We’re going to proceed to encourage Congress to codify Roe. That’s how we consider ladies’s rights might be protected.
Q Another query. On oil costs: They’re up right this moment on the expectation that OPEC+ goes to chop manufacturing by an estimated million barrels a day. Would a manufacturing lower endanger international provides? And the way does the President plan to reply?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So, simply to be very clear right here on that piece, we’re simply not going to touch upon any OPEC motion till OPEC acts, as you all know.
In any occasion, we’ll proceed to take steps to guard American shoppers. Our focus — and it’s been very clear for the previous a number of — a number of months — has been on taking each step to make sure markets are sufficiently equipped to fulfill demand for a rising international financial system.
And because of this President’s efforts, we — and his historic actions that he has taken, vitality costs have declined sharply from their highs and American shoppers are paying far much less on the pump than they have been a number of months in the past. And once more, it’s due to the historic steps that this President has taken.
Q Thanks, Karine. Is there — given the 100 days out from the Dobbs ruling, is there a priority on this White Home, within the administration that this situation is falling when it comes to prime significance points that voters are going to be voting on come the midterms, provided that we’re now seeing these polls that present that it ranks beneath the financial system and beneath inflation —
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So I wish to —
Q — because the — his calendar strikes ahead (inaudible)?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: As you possibly can — as you possibly can think about, I wish to be very cautious on how I discuss polls and the way I discuss — I can not discuss, communicate to elections.
What I can communicate to is: This was — if you consider Roe v. Wade and if you consider the way it was a constitution- — it was a constitutional legislation for nearly 50 years. It defend ladies for nearly 50 years.
And in June, when the Dobbs determination was made by the Supreme Court docket, it took away almost 50 years of protections for ladies. And we now have seen ladies reply. We have now seen People reply simply throughout — throughout the nation on — on totally different initiatives, clearly. They usually have been — made their — their voices very loud and clear. And so, I anticipate that we are going to proceed to see that kind of response, we’ll proceed to see not simply from ladies however from People communicate up.
And what we now have inspired, what the President has continued to encourage is to make it possible for we — we, you understand, get Congress to behave. The way in which that we defend ladies, the best way that we defend privateness, the best way we defend contraception, the best way that we defend healthcare for ladies and for ladies to make these selections — they’re — these are tough selections that ladies — that ladies are making, that they need to be making for themselves with their — with their healthcare supplier. Nobody else ought to be making that call — no Republican official — no Republican official of their state or nationally.
And so, we’re going to proceed to make that very clear.
Q After which rapidly on North Korea, we’re seeing a document variety of launches this yr. That is the fifth take a look at in simply over the week. What’s the White Home evaluation on why this appears to be ramping up? After which, when it comes to a response, when an analogous missile strike occurred in 2017, you noticed then-President Trump ship these supersonic bombs. May you stroll us by the distinction within the response strategy from this administration to the final, should you’re taking a quieter one?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So since that is the primary time I’m being requested this query, I wish to lay out simply a few issues right here. As we famous in our assertion final night time, we strongly condemn Democratic Re- — Individuals’s Republic of Korea — DPRK’s harmful and reckless determination to launch a long-range ballistic missile over Japan. The launch was a hazard to the Japanese individuals, destabilizing to the area, and a transparent — a transparent violation of the United Nations Council’s — Safety Council resolutions.
The USA will proceed its efforts to restrict the DPRK’s capacity to advance its prohibited — prohibited ballistic missile and weapons of mass destruction applications, together with with allies and U.N. companions.
Because it pertains to our response: Final night time, Nationwide Safety Advisor Jake Sullivan and Secretary Blinken spoke with their Japanese and Republic of Korea counterparts. This morning, President Biden spoke with Prime Minister Kishida of Japan, the place he bolstered our ironclad dedication to Japan’s protection. And following this launch, U.S. Marine Corps fighters joined Japan air self-defense fighters in a bilateral train over the Sea of Japan to reinforce operational readiness and responses to regional threats whereas defending our nations and to additional strengthen regional peace and stability.
Moreover, simply so as to add right here, U.S. Indo-Pacific Command and Republic of Korea — ROK — personnel carried out a bilateral train as nicely over the West Sea to showcase mixed deterrent and dynamic strike capabilities whereas demonstrating our nation’s bilateral interoperability.
We’ll proceed to coordinate the rapid and longer-term response bilaterally, trilaterally with the Republic of Korea and with the worldwide group. So we now have been fairly — speaking to our counterparts; having — taking bilateral, trilateral actions over the — during the last 12, 20 hours or so. And so, we’ll proceed to try this.
Q Thanks, Karine. And only a fast follow-up on that. Was there form of any consensus that was reached on easy methods to grapple with these missile launches contemplating we’ve been seeing them constantly?
And, you understand, we perceive that the President had this dialog and Jake had this dialog, however is the sense that the White Home is simply, form of, resigned to persevering with to let these launches happen? Or, you understand, are there particular, form of, factors of motion that you may share —
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Nicely, I simply laid out factors of actions that we now have taken — these bilateral actions. So, actually we’re taking —
Q — for this — for this launch?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Nicely, we’re taking this very, very critically, for certain. And we now have been — and we now have commented — as you understand, and also you’ve heard us touch upon — on any missiles which have been launched during the last a number of months.
Look, our place although on that is: Diplomacy and dialogue stay the identical. That has not modified. And so, this motion underscores the pressing want for dialogue and diplomacy. We perceive that, and that’s what we now have been calling for.
Our aim stays the whole denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. We stay ready to interact in critical and sustained diplomacy to make tangible progress in direction of that finish. And we stay ready to fulfill with the DPRK with out preconditions. You’ve heard me say this a number of occasions from this podium during the last a number of months.
And it’s unlucky that the DPRK has not responded to our outreach. However, once more, we’re dedicated to our allies. I simply laid out what we now have executed up to now a number of hours to point out that dedication. And that’s — that’s what we’re — how we’re going to proceed to maneuver ahead.
Q And do you assume, you understand, this missile launch was form of a direct response from North Korea to the Vice President visiting the DMZ not too long ago?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Look, I’m not going to — going to get into the hypotheticals or get into — into the thoughts of the North Korea chief. I can simply lay out our response to this present, most up-to-date missile launch and, once more, our dedication to our companions within the area.
Q And simply to follow-up on, I believe, on each of these to a point. I perceive what the actions that the U.S. and its allies have taken, however do you guys have an evaluation — there’s a number of basic theories as to why there’s been form of a fast escalation over the course of the final a number of months. Do you may have an evaluation as to the why? What are they in search of? What do they need? What’s the administration’s view of the aim behind these escalations?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: I’m not going to get into any assessments from right here. Clearly, that’s — you understand, that’s one thing that we’re all the time protecting an in depth eye on. What I can communicate to is our response and our continued efforts to restrict the DPRK’s capacity to advance its ballistic missile and weapons. And that’s what we’re going to proceed to maneuver ahead.
Once more, I laid out our response. I’m not going to get into evaluation or specifics as to the why.
Q Okay. After which on Iran, there’s been a notably totally different posture from administration this time round with the protests when in comparison with 2009 and people protests. Clearly, there’s already been sanctions. The President form of telegraphed extra sanctions doubtlessly coming within the days forward. What’s the goal right here for the USA? Is it to cease the protests crackdowns? Is it to have Iran change the legal guidelines which might be being protested proper now? Or is it regime change? What’s the tip aim right here?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So what our objective is — and also you’ve heard from the President, you’ve heard from me, you’ve heard from the Nationwide Safety Advisor at this podium and on varied networks — is that we stand with all of the residents of Iran who’re inspiring the world with their bravery, and we’ll proceed to face with them. That’s how we see our function — our function right here.
Men and women in Iran ought to have the proper to freedom of expression and meeting. Ladies ought to be capable of put on what they need, free from violence or harassment. Iran should finish its use of violence towards its personal residents merely for exercising their basic freedoms, their basic rights.
We’ll proceed to take motion to carry Iran officers accountable and help the rights of Iranians to protest freely. We have now — simply final week, we laid out the actions that we have been taking: ensuring that Iranians had entry to Web as the federal government was stopping that — that freedom to entry their proper to international Web. We took actions there.
And we’re — we’ll have extra this week. You’ll hear from the USA on what we’ll be imposing — additional prices on these pr- — how we’ll be imposing additional prices on these perpetrators of violence towards peaceable protesters. And we’ll proceed to carry Iranian officers accountable.
Q However there’s no aim to raise the protests to create maybe instability within the regime or something like that?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Nicely, we see our function — are ensuring that we present our help and stand with the residents of Iran right now. And as you may have seen from my — our actions, that we’re taking this very critically, and also you’ll hear extra this week.
Q I needed to ask concerning the standing of Brittney Griner’s launch. As you understand, the Russian courtroom has set a courtroom date for her. However this supply has been on the desk for months now. Is there any form of motion to get her launched? And is there any form of deadline that the administration can suggest to get some form of motion on this?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So, let me first say that we’re conscious of Russia’s announcement that Brittney Griner might be pressured to endure one other sham judicial continuing. She ought to be launched instantly. As we now have mentioned many occasions, Brittney Griner and Paul Whelan have been wrongfully detained by Russian authorities.
President Biden — who met with, as you all know, their households about two weeks in the past proper right here within the White Home — is constant to direct his administration to interact with Russian authorities by each accessible channel and make each effort to convey them residence. That could be a dedication that he has made.
As I’ve mentioned many occasions, it’s — you understand, it’s a — once more, a dedication that he has made on their explicit negotiations.
However we would like Russia — what we’ll say is that we would like Russia to take the supply that we now have placed on the desk — a considerable supply, as you’ve heard us say many occasions — critically. And — and if — if not — in the event that they — or they’ll make a critical counteroffer. However they should make a critical counteroffer.
However once more, you understand, the President has demonstrated that he’s keen to go to extraordinary lengths and make robust selections to convey People residence, as he did simply over the weekend to convey residence all the People designated as “wrongfully detained” in Venezuela.
So, this can be a dedication that he has made to the American individuals, and this can be a dedication that he has made to their households.
Q You have been saying, “And if not,” then what? I imply, for her household that’s been ready for this for months, and Russia hasn’t made any indication that they’re accepting this deal, I imply, what else can the administration do to use strain? At what level —
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So, we — I imply, I simply laid out that we should always take — they need to take this critical — this — this supply — this substantial supply that we placed on the desk critically or make a critical counteroffer. However we have to see a critical counteroffer on this.
Look, the President has demonstrated many occasions throughout his administration how critically he takes this, how critically he takes People who’re wrongfully detained.
We have now seen this simply over the weekend. We noticed this with Trevor — Trevor Reed. We have now — we now have made certain that we now have taken each step doable to make it possible for we convey these People residence. And so, that dedication continues, that dedication stands.
And so, we’re not going to barter in public, as you’ve heard us say many occasions. However we’re going to proceed to have these discussions with Russian authorities by the accessible channels which have been supplied to us.
Q After which, a fast query on abortion rights and entry. The administration’s place has been that Congress must act, however that’s simply utterly unrealistic. I do know the President has supported altering the filibuster guidelines to permit for a vote, however even — you understand, there isn’t help within the Democratic Caucus for altering these guidelines.
Has the President been speaking to, form of, holdouts on the filibuster about this? Has he been speaking to Republican senators who’ve their very own proposal on abortion entry? At what level, you understand, is the administration saying that Congress must act however is the administration being life like about what the dynamics on Capitol Hill are? Even when Democrats have been in a position to acquire seats, it nonetheless wouldn’t be sufficient.
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Proper. And he’s additionally mentioned that the American individuals must make it possible for their voices are being heard. That can be an vital piece of Congress appearing. , the American individuals have a say right here; they’ve a say on what occurs subsequent on this situation.
And so, the President has been very clear on that. I’ve to be very cautious in how I communicate concerning the subsequent couple of weeks as a result of I can’t talk about elections from right here. However he has — he’s made that very clear in each speech that he’s made about this explicit situation, about codifying Roe.
And it’s, sure, “Congress must act,” but in addition the American public have an vital function to play right here. They’ll make their voices heard on this situation by — you understand, by ensuring that they do what we now have been — we’ve been seeing throughout the nation, particularly on points which have been put — on Roe — on the poll.
And also you’ve seen — you’ve seen simply, you understand, a document quantity of — of girls come out and say, “No, we’re not going to permit this to occur.”
I simply wish to be very cautious of how far I can go right here. However, once more, that is one thing that the American individuals have a say in as nicely.
Q Hey, Karine. Another from me on North Korea. You’ve laid out quite a few the bilateral and trilateral conversations which might be occurring in any respect ranges of presidency with our allies within the area. Prior to now, we’ve seen that China is commonly a helpful interlocutor when it comes to coping with the North Koreans. Is there any outreach at this stage to a few of our Chinese language counterparts to attempt to possibly see if there’s a method they are often useful within the state of affairs?
And do you may have an replace on whether or not the President is likely to be assembly in particular person with President Xi on the G20?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: As you understand, the President and — has been in — has had a number of dialog with President Xi, and we’ve learn out all of these — all of these cellphone dialog.
We don’t have a gathering to put out or preview for all of you within the subsequent coming weeks or by the tip of this yr. Once we do, we actually will share that. I don’t have every other conversations with the Chinese language authorities to share right now as nicely.
Q And on the President’s name with President Zelenskyy, there was an announcement together with that of extra safety help to the Ukrainians. I’m questioning how Ukraine’s success on the battlefield of late is factoring into selections throughout the administration about doubtlessly accelerating this supply of help to attempt to press the benefit now and the way that’s being calibrated with the threats we’re listening to from the Russian facet about potential nuclear retaliation on this state of affairs. Is that form of a push and pull that’s factoring into our decision-making (inaudible)?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So, you understand, we all the time say “nothing with out Ukraine.” Nothing — “no motion on Ukraine with out Ukraine.” Proper? That’s one thing — relating to any kind of diplomacy or dialog that’s being had, that actually they should be within the room for that — for that piece.
And, look, relating to a nuclear — a possible nuclear menace, we now have been very — very clear about that. We take any nuclear — nuclear weapons or nuclear saber-rattling very critically right here.
However I do wish to say — I do wish to say that we now have not seen any cause to regulate our personal strategic nuclear posture, nor do we now have indication that Russia is getting ready to imminently use nuclear weapons.
What you’re seeing — the $600 million that we introduced right this moment of nuclear assistan- — pardon me, of safety help, it’s only a continued dedication that we now have confirmed to Ukraine. As a result of, as you all know, he’s fight- — they’re combating — the courageous individuals of Ukraine are combating for his or her freedom; they’re combating for his or her sovereignty. And so, that is one thing that we consider — not simply the U.S. — our allies and companions world wide see this as an vital — an vital partnership that we now have to make it possible for Ukraine is ready to try this.
And so, as we now have seen their successes on the battlefield, as we now have seen them take again even territory that was supposedly annexed simply a few days in the past, they’re — you understand, they’re — we’re seeing them have these beneficial properties in taking again their very own territory.
And so, we’re going to proceed to make it possible for we’re there for the Ukrainians. That’s why you heard — we did the readout of the President’s name with Zelenskyy saying that we’re going to proceed to be there and be in partnership with them, and in addition give them a heads-up of what we’re going to supply and ensuring that they proceed these successes on the battlefield.
Look, that is vital. That is very critical. Once we’re speaking a few nation’s democracy, while you’re speaking a few nation’s freedom, it will be significant for us to be there and stand with the Ukrainian individuals, and that’s what you’re going to proceed to see.
Q And one final query from me. You talked about the President might be assembly with Governor DeSantis tomorrow as a part of his journey to Florida. They’ve met in particular person up to now when he was visiting Surfside as nicely. Each of these conversations have been above politics, centered on the tragedies at hand. However I’m questioning if the President will search for a chance behind the scenes, privately tomorrow, to talk with Governor DeSantis about a few of his issues about his actions because it pertains to flying migrants to different jurisdictions.
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So, you understand, clearly the President laid out his issues and outrage by the stunt — the political stunt — and by the truth that individuals have been misled. You’ve — you’ve heard me discuss this. You’ve heard the President discuss this and the way they have been misled and flown throughout the nation with every kind of guarantees that weren’t true.
There might be loads of occasions — loads of time to debate variations between the President and the governor, and — however now is just not the time. As you’ve heard from the President, he has mentioned, you understand, relating to delivering and ensuring that the individuals of Florida have what they want, particularly after Hurricane Ian, we’re one — we’re working as one.
And so that’s what the President goes to be doing when he’s there in Florida. He’s going to be listening to the individuals who reside there, who’ve misplaced a lot. He’s going to be speaking to the
respondents [responders] on the bottom who’ve been — executed large work. As you understand, the FEMA Administrator might be touring with him as nicely.
And — they usually’re going to — you understand, Governor DeSantis and President Biden, as they’ve executed a number of occasions main as much as — main as much as this present day, as they’ve been — as Florida has been coping with this hurricane, they’re going to speak about what — what — how — what else wants — what else are the wants in Florida to get to a spot of restoration, to get to a spot of rebuilding.
However once more, that is going to be, as you’ve mentioned, above politics. You might have seen them do that earlier than when Surfside — you — I keep in mind you traveled with us once we went to Surfside, when the President and Governor DeSantis listened to the individuals of Florida who dealt — in that group — who handled a lot misplaced, family members. And in order that’s what you’re going to see once more tomorrow. And likewise, you noticed that yesterday in Puerto Rico.
Q Thanks, Karine. You’ve mentioned the President was liable for gasoline costs coming down. Is the President liable for gasoline costs going up?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So, it’s much more nuanced than that. Proper, Peter? this. There have been international challenges that we now have all have handled. After I say “all,” that means different nations as nicely have handled for the reason that pandemic. There’s been pandemic and there’s been Putin’s conflict. And Putin’s conflict has elevated gasoline costs on the pump. We have now seen that over the la- — previous a number of months.
And what the President was in a position to do — he took some historic steps, when you consider the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, and ensuring that he — we have been in a position to do every part that we will to convey that price down for American households, give them a bit of bit extra of a respiration room. And we noticed that. We noticed that daily this summer season over — saving American households over a greenback per gallon.
And so that’s what the President goes to proceed to remain centered on — are American shoppers; how will we proceed to maintain — to maintain costs down.
That’s why we did the Inflation Discount Act. That’s why we speak concerning the CHIPS Act. All of these items are going to assist People right here on this nation.
Q And there are shoppers now in California paying $6.41 a gallon for gasoline; Nevada, $5.51; Oregon, $5.46. Who can afford that?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: And we perceive that. That’s why the President labored so exhausting the previous a number of months to make it possible for he did every part we will to convey gasoline costs down. We have now seen quickest — I do know you’re pulling out a few areas throughout the nation, and I get that. And we perceive that there’s extra work to do. We have now by no means mentioned we have been executed right here. We have now all the time been very clear that there’s extra work to do.
However we now have seen — the fact is we now have seen the quickest decline in gasoline costs in over a decade. That’s due to what this President has executed. And once more, costs taking place by greater than a greenback per gallon. And these are actual financial savings. You’re speaking about $100 per thirty days in financial savings for a mean household with two automobiles.
Q When the President went to Saudi Arabia, he mentioned, “I’m doing all I can to extend the availability for the USA of America, which I anticipate to occur.” What occurred?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So let’s — I wish to be very clear. And we now have mentioned that, you understand, his journey to — his journey to the Center East was not about oil. It was about America’s place within the Center East and session with 12 leaders from throughout the area on a spread of points, much like his summits in Asia or the Americas and later this yr with African leaders.
The President’s journey was essential — it was crucial to U.S. nationwide safety — a extra peaceable, built-in area — and for international safety. And there have been loads of examples that we laid out to all of you as why this journey was so vital.
However apart from that, the President took motion, as I simply talked about. He took motion these previous a number of months. And daily on this — this summer season, you noticed costs tick down on the pump. And that’s — however we didn’t simply cease there. We did –you noticed legislative actions, historic actions that the President took to make it possible for we’re persevering with to create jobs in America, we’re persevering with to decrease costs.
So there are a number of actions that this President has taken.
Q Thanks. Can I comply with up on Iran? Does the choice by the CIA Director, Mr. Invoice Burns, to talk out in help of the demonstrators in Iran was coordinated by the White Home? As a result of as you understand, Karine, CIA director don’t communicate typically. So is that this a direct message to the Iranian regime that the U.S. will assist the demonstrators?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: I — are you able to say that first half concerning the CIA? I didn’t hear that half.
Q So he — Invoice Burns gave an interview yesterday —
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Okay.
Q — and he talked in help of the Iranian demonstrators. However was this coordinated by the White Home? As a result of for him to talk, that has weight. So, is that this a direct message?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: However we — however we now have been very clear. The President’s voice additionally has weight, proper? The President has spoken about his issues that he — concerning the depth of the violent crackdown on peaceable protesters in Iran — once more, who’re demanding, as you understand, their equal rights and fundamental human dignity.
He’s spoken — he spoke out about that throughout the U.N. — the U.N. — throughout UNGA Meeting that we noticed — the Common Meeting that we noticed simply two weeks in the past. He was very clear. You’ve see- — you’ve heard statements from him. You’ve heard statements from his Nationwide Safety Advisor. You’ve heard statements from me.
In order a — as an administration, as a — holistically, we’ve been very, very clear. And the President has taken actions. We’re making it simpler for Iranians to entry the Web, together with by facilitating larger entry to safe exterior platforms and companies. And we’re holding Iranian officers accountable.
And so that you’ve seen us take actions by the U.S. Treasury and do our half in ensuring that we’re supporting the Iranian individuals.
Q However my level to you that I’m making an attempt to articulate is: As a result of he’s the top of the CIA —
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: No, I hear your query. Certain.
Q However due to that —
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: No —
Q — do you assume that the Iranian regime would possibly see that as an interference by the American intelligence, which is — typically they mentioned this accusation towards the administrations?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Look, I — I hear your query, however what I’m saying is: We’re — we, as an administration, the President straight is talking out on what we’re seeing on the bottom. We have now issues. We consider that the Iranian individuals — ladies, specifically — have the proper to their freedoms, and we’re going to talk out about that. And I believe that’s vital.
You all are reporting this. You all are seeing yourselves what is occurring on the bottom. And — and so we’re going to proceed — we’re going to proceed to impose additional prices as — on the perpetrators of those violence. And so we’re going to — we’re going to proceed to talk out. And I believe that’s the proper factor to do. We expect that’s the proper factor to do.
Q I’ve two health-related questions. First, on the abortion situation and the Title IX steerage that the Schooling Division launched right this moment, are there present examples of the forms of violations that this steerage is making an attempt to cease?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: I don’t have any explicit examples for you right now. I might refer you to the company to ask for particular — particular examples that they’ll share with you.
Q Okay. After which, final week, the Kaiser Household Basis launched a ballot exhibiting that just about half of adults had heard little to no- — little to nothing concerning the COVID booster regardless of, you understand, the efforts by the administration and others to launch for this schooling marketing campaign this fall to get individuals to get boosters. Do you may have a response to this? Are you involved about it? Are you going to be doing the rest in mild of this to attempt to step up these schooling outreach efforts?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So — no, it’s an vital query to ask. I do know Dr. Jha truly spoke to this yesterday, and I wish to give a bit of little bit of context. I do know individuals have had questions on the information, particularly on how many individuals are literally getting this new vaccine.
So simply to present you a bit of bit about — on what we now have: We estimated about 10 million People acquired their up to date COVID-19 vaccines within the month of September. As Dr. Jha mentioned yesterday, we’re off to a powerful begin with about 10 million People with their up to date vaccine. It signifies that within the first three weeks of our fall vaccination program, a whole bunch of hundreds of People acquired their up to date COVID-19 vaccine every day.
And so even with the restricted funding, as we now have spoken to many occasions, we’re completely doing extra to verify we’re redoubling our efforts on defending these at excessive danger, particularly elder — aged People, together with by a brand new paid media marketing campaign and focused engagement efforts.
And throughout the group, there’s been good progress. Nearly half of up to date vaccines administered up to now have gone to these age 65 and older. And in October, we’re going to be constructing on that as nicely.
Subsequent week, we hope to have Dr. Jha and in addition Dr. Fauci right here within the briefing room to take — to take your questions, clearly, on this new va- — on this new vaccination program and the way we’re ensuring that People are conscious they usually know the significance of getting this new vaccine.
So that you’re going to listen to straight from the docs subsequent week and — simply laying out how crucial and the way vital it’s to make it possible for they’re getting that vaccine — that — vaccinated.
Okay. Welcome to the briefing room.
Q Thanks a lot, Karine. It’s nice to be right here. (Laughter.)
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Are you certain? (Laughter.)
Q I’ll attempt to — attempt to make this as painless as doable.
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Take — take your time. We have now a number of time. Take your time. No strain. No strain.
Q The administration and the White Home is marking the 100 days for the reason that Dobbs Act right here. As you’re doing that, over on the Supreme Court docket, there are a selection of different rights which might be going to be on the desk this time period. I’m desirous about voting rights. I’m desirous about potential affirmative motion, the Clear Water Act.
And, you understand, this administration obtained some criticism for its — for a way proactive or how reactionary it was to the Dobbs Act. And I’m questioning — determination. And I’m questioning if a few of these different rights, if the White Home is taking proactive motion to doubtlessly get ready for seeing the Voting Rights Act scaled again or seeing the tip of affirmative motion in universities.
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So, I simply wish to get again to your — what you have been saying about — alluding to on abortion and the criticism that we’ve obtained there on the Dobbs determination.
I wish to be very clear, as a result of I believe it’s vital to notice and I’ve famous it a few occasions — is, you understand, when the leak of the doc occurred, we did take motion. We did take motion in these weeks main as much as the precise determination, and that was assembly with teams, that was assembly internally, making an attempt to determine one of the best ways that we have been going to take — that we have been going to reply if certainly the leaked doc on the time, throughout that second, was true.
And so I wish to be very clear and proceed to appropriate the document right here, is that the President has all the time taken this very critically relating to Roe. He’s all the time taken ladies’s rights and girls’s capacity to decide on their very own healthcare. And likewise, he was very clear that — what this might result in, proper? This might result in not simply Roe — the Dobbs determination — however it may additionally result in marriage equality, contraception. He was ve- — he was one of many first voices that sounded the alarm on what this might doubtlessly — down the trail, the harmful path that the Dobbs determination may take us to.
And we’re seeing that. We’re seeing efforts of that at the moment from, you understand, Republican officers and Republican voices nationally. They usually’ve been very, very clear.
So, because it pertains to this query of the courts, sure, you understand, the protections that we now have held so pricey and close to are as soon as once more on the road on this time period. And we’re very clear about that and we perceive what’s doubtlessly at stake right here.
We’ll proceed to do every part inside our energy to defend basic rights from particular pursuits which might be bent on destroying them. That doesn’t cease us. We’re going to proceed to talk out on that.
And — and that is — relating to individuals’s basic rights, basic freedoms, that is one thing that the President and the Vice President goes to combat for.
Q After which simply to comply with up, earlier you talked about how the President is aware of that the American individuals could have their say in these issues in a matter of about 5 weeks. I do know you possibly can’t discuss politics from there, however how a lot can we anticipate the President to take that message on the highway to the varied locations within the nation the place there are key elections and they’re going to have a voice and that voice will impression the President’s time period when it comes to his legislative agenda?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Nicely, look, I can’t get into the subsequent 5 weeks and what — the place he’s going to be and any of the politics.
What I can say very clearly is that, you understand, again in August, we put out a memo laying out what this administration was going to be doing with a view to communicate to how we’re delivering for the American individuals. We talked concerning the Inflation Discount Act and what that’s going to imply for hundreds of thousands of People throughout the nation relating to healthcare, relating to Medicare, relating to vitality prices, relating to placing probably the most vital funding in combating local weather change. We’re going to speak about that.
We’re going to speak concerning the bipartisan infrastructure laws. We’re going to speak concerning the CHIPS Act. I simply gave an announcement on what Micron is doing, the funding that they’re bringing into this nation and ensuring that we’re having a — strengthening our provide chain; chipmaking, which goes to be so vital in reducing prices.
And so, it’s not simply the President. It’s going to be the Cupboard Secretaries. It’s going to be — it’s going to be the Vice President. And it’s going to be congressional members inside their districts or senators of their states.
And so, we laid out that plan on what you will see from us. Any specifics on any, you understand, 2022-specific technique, I can not communicate from — to that from right here.
Go forward, Karen.
Q Thanks. The governor of Puerto Rico yesterday made a really particular ask to increase the 100% catastrophe funding for 180 days. Is the President contemplating that? Has he decided? The place does that stand, that request?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: In order that — that request, I must test with the workforce. Don’t have something particularly on the request that the governor made. I did keep in mind — I keep in mind listening to that.
However, you understand, one of many issues that we wish to make it possible for got here out — I imply, what you all noticed from that — from the President and the First Woman’s go to is that you just noticed a President that was dedicated to creating certain that the — that the individuals in Puerto Rico usually are not forgotten, that our brothers and sisters in Puerto Rico acquired the necessity and the assistance — the necessity — the assistance that they wanted to rebuild and to — and to make it possible for they weren’t forgotten. And in order that’s the takeaway that I might — that I would offer to you.
The President made a dedication. He made a promise that we are going to get them again on their ft and we might be there for the long run. And that’s why he made the announcement, should you all keep in mind, on the Puerto Rico grid modernization workforce, which goes to — which goes to be popping out of the Division of Power, which goes to help Puerto Rico in rebuilding its electrical energy grid in order that it’s extra resilient and safe.
The Secretary will carefully — will work carefully with the governor to assist deal with challenges and rebuild the mandatory infrastructure, permitting the island to raised stand up to more and more stronger storms and pure catastrophe. The workforce will work with different businesses — together with FEMA, HUD, and Commerce — to coordinate sources from throughout the federal authorities and guarantee funding is utilized in an expeditious and strategic method to finest serve the grid and the individuals of Puerto Rico. And that’s going to be our dedication to — to the individuals of the island.
Q Only one fast factor. The President, yesterday, in Puerto Rico, along with getting the briefing, did give public remarks with the governor and others close to him. Is he going to be giving, like, a public speech in Florida as nicely? And can Governor DeSantis be with him for that or simply for the briefing?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So we all know that the governor has a busy schedule as he’s coping with the aftermath of a catastrophic storm — as all of us noticed for ourselves and plenty of of you may have been reporting on it — so I can’t communicate particularly to the place he’s going to be at each step of the day. We could have extra to share on what the President and the First Woman are going to be doing tomorrow.
Q Thanks. Do you may have something on the — the Russians say that they detained — or truly imprisoned someone known as Robert Gilman, who apparently attacked a police officer over there. He’s been sentenced to four-plus years in jail in Russia. Is that this in your radar? Is that this seen as one other problematic case or only a common —
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So, I must test with the workforce. I don’t have something right now to share on that specific particular person.
Q Okay. And a really fast one. Did the President inform Al Sharpton he’s operating? (Inaudible) clearly.
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: You’re keen on asking me — Sebastian, you’re keen on asking me about 2024.
Q Nicely, no, I requested you, “Did he inform.” Did he say it? Did he say, “Hey, Al, I’m operating”?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Right here’s what I’ll say —
Q I simply need a clear reply. Solely Al Sharpton has acquired it —
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: I do know you need a clear reply. I do know. However he’s — (laughter) —
Q — apparently.
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: If Al Sharpton says it, it’s — you understand, look, I — oh, it’s so humorous. You all the time ask me about 2024.
So, right here’s what I can say — and the President has mentioned this himself: He intends to run in 2024. As you understand, I can not weigh in on elections; I can not communicate to elections from right here. We do — we do actually comply with and attempt to comply with the Hatch Act right here. However I’ll simply reiterate what the President has mentioned many occasions, what I’ve mentioned many occasions — is that the President intends to run.
Q Karine, thanks. The Strategic Petroleum Reserve — the run out — run off or launch of 1 million barrels a day ends on the finish of this month. Is there any conversations about releasing extra oil from the Strategic Petroleum? And the way is the President going to maintain the availability up?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So, we’re not contemplating new releases — releases from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve past the 180 million, which is what you’re speak — talking about — the 1 million that the President introduced months in the past. We don’t have something extra to share or we’re not going to be contemplating new releases right now.
Q Does the President besides — anticipate gasoline costs to rise then?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Look, we — we now have been very, very clear that we’re going to proceed to do every part that we will to present People a bit of little bit of respiration room. The decline that you just’ve seen the final a number of months is historic in some ways, as a result of it’s the quickest decline in gasoline costs that we now have seen in over a decade.
The President goes to proceed to try this work, however it’s not simply, you understand, gasoline costs. We’ve talked concerning the Inflation Discount Act and the way he’s working to verify we decrease prices for People, whether or not healthcare or vitality. We speak — I simply laid out the CHIPS Act and the way vital that’s going to be in reducing prices and in addition creating jobs proper right here in America.
And so, we’re going to proceed to try this work, however, proper now, I don’t have — we’re not contemplating to be doing something extra with the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.
Q Thanks, Karine. Is the administration apprehensive that Elon Musk is spreading Russian propaganda?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Are you able to be extra particular?
Q Nicely, this weekend, he put out this, quote, “peace plan” that features giving Russia Crimea and, like, redoing a few of these elections however with the U.N. watching. So, I’m questioning if there’s a priority there.
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So, we’ve been very clear about this. And I simply mentioned this earlier within the briefing: Something about Ukraine — we’re not going to speak about Ukraine with out Ukraine. It’s their determination to make relating to any diplomacy or negotiations in that regard. And so, I go away that to the Ukrainian individuals.
However look, you understand, we’re going to make it possible for we’re going to be there for the Ukrainians as they combat for their very own — for his or her sovereignty. And their — that call about their sovereignty, about their freedom, about their democracy might be made with them.
Q And in — a form of barely totally different query — however are there issues about Elon Musk buying Twitter?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Any issues about — I’ve not —
Q Elon Musk buying Twitter.
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: I’ve not — has there been one thing new on that?
Q Sure, simply right this moment.
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So, I’m — we now have been very clear on not commenting, and — on any specifics, potential transaction from right here, so I’ll go away it on — I’ll go away it to them.
Go forward, Karen.
Q Thanks, Karine. The administration has mentioned People will be capable of apply for pupil mortgage forgiveness starting early this month. Is the method being held up in any respect due to the lawsuits which have been introduced?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: I don’t have something extra on that. I believe you’ll hear extra from us, from the Division of Schooling on that piece of that implementation course of. I believe I’ve laid it out a few occasions right here. They’ve made — they despatched out some emails — emails final week.
However because it pertains to the authorized items, the lawsuits that you just’re seeing throughout the nation, it’s a disgrace. It’s a disgrace that you’ve got Republicans on the market — Republican teams, Republican states — which might be making an attempt to cease People from getting a bit of little bit of a respiration room, a bit of little bit of a break.
We’re speaking about 40 million People that would profit from getting pupil mortgage reduction. And it’s — it’s shameful that they’re siding with the particular pursuits. It’s shameful that they’re not siding with the American individuals on this.
And let’s not overlook: 90 p.c of debtors who’re going to be receiving that reduction might be making beneath $75,000.
This can be a dedication that the President has made. He made it throughout his marketing campaign. And this is likely one of the — one of many ways in which the President goes to proceed to work for the American individuals, looking for methods to present them a bit of little bit of a break.
And let’s not overlook: The pause goes to — goes to elevate in December, so persons are going to be paying again their loans. And whereas we’re going by that course of, he needed to make it possible for people who’re — who — you understand, who have been actually affected by — particularly by the pandemic, additionally acquired — that we didn’t overlook them and provides them a bit of little bit of a break as nicely.
Q Thanks. A pair fast ones. Final week, I requested about Navy Lieutenant Ridge Alkonis. I didn’t know should you had an replace on his case.
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Oh, I don’t have an replace for you on that. I apologize. You probably did ask me about that.
Q After which I needed to ask — the President not too long ago praised a bunch of Coast Guard rescue swimmers. One among them reportedly faces termination as a result of he isn’t vaccinated. I’m curious, given the threats that we’re going through overseas, would the President ever rethink that vaccination requirement or think about issuing extra exemptions?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So, as you — as — as you possibly can think about, the President has probably the most — the deepest respect for the U.S. Coast Guard. That’s one thing that you’d hear from him straight. And the nation — the President and the nation are grateful for all the U.S. Coast Guard heroes which have led the trouble to save lots of lives in Florida. We have now seen that with our very personal eyes these previous couple of days.
I might refer you particularly to the U.S. Coast Guard on this — on this situation, on this particular person questions. It’s not one thing that I might remark from right here.
However, you understand, there, after all, have been a number of vaccination necessities, as you understand, in place for fairly a while. And — however, once more, I’m not going to remark right here — from right here on a person case.
Q Okay. Then, a 3rd one. Final week, the President introduced up the Italian election, unprompted, in some remarks. And he appeared to say that the election of the Italian prime minister — or, I ought to say, the incoming Italian prime minister was a part of this bigger, larger international battle between democracies and autocracies.
Was the President suggesting that the election of that prime minister was by some means a part of that bigger menace to democracy?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So, look, as we now have mentioned, and I’ve mentioned this earlier than, we respect the democratic alternative of the Italian individuals. We have now mentioned that, and it’s one thing that we are going to proceed to say.
And we stand — the USA stands prepared and desperate to work with the brand new authorities that emerges from the electoral course of and to proceed to work collectively as allies to advance our many shared objectives and curiosity — mutual pursuits, as you understand.
However I don’t have something additional on — on his feedback.
, I’ll say, you understand, he — you understand, the President views — simply generally, extra broadly — the rise of the far proper as — as well-known, and that’s — that’s one thing he’s been very clear about. However I wou- — I wouldn’t have something so as to add on what he mentioned.
Q Thanks, Karine.
Q Thanks, Karine.
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: I used to be calling —
Q Thanks. Another on Ukraine. Right now, India’s Prime Minister Modi known as — had a name with Ukrainian President Zelenskyy, throughout which he mentioned about this “no army resolution” to this drawback. They usually talked about peace and diplomacy.
I simply needed you to test with you: Is there any coordination between India and the U.S. on the Ukraine and Russian disaster? Has President spoken to Prime Minister Modi on this?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So, I don’t have any, like — something to learn out on any current dialog with Prime Minister Modi. However I — you understand, he — his public feedback on to Putin are very clear: Now is just not the time for conflict. And it’s not the time — he was much more particular than that. He mentioned “his” conflict, Putin’s conflict, he was — he was — he was alluding to.
Look, Putin is going through additional isolation from worldwide communities. As nations clarify, Putin’s determination doesn’t have a number of sympathy ears. He doesn’t have a number of sympathetic ears right here on his determination to have this conflict and his determination to — to — to begin this brutal conflict towards Ukraine, a brutal — a conflict towards their democracy. And — and so, not many individuals have a sympathetic ear to President Putin.
We’re as- — we’re asking that nations world wide — and we’ve been very clear about that — proceed to talk out publicly and proceed to interact diplomatically on this as nicely. And so I believe that’s what you’re seeing from the prime minister.
Q Another on — final yr, President quietly celebrated Diwali on the White Home — Diwali, generally known as the Competition of Lights for the Hindus, Jains, and Sikhs.
President has appointed giant variety of Indian People within the administration — 113-plus and counting. Lots of them vote for him, help him.
Does the President has any plans to have fun Diwali with the Indian People group leaders on the White Home this yr?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Sure, he has plans to have fun Diwali, similar to he did final yr. We don’t have a date to share with you right now. However it’s an occasion that he thinks it’s essential, as he sees a partnership with Indian — with India, in addition to Indian People right here on this nation.
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Yeah. After which we’ll —
Q Thanks. On abortion, it’s been 100 days since Dobbs; it’s been extra for the reason that draft leak — leaked. Isn’t it truthful to say that if the administration noticed any vital profit in an emergency declaration, that it will have occurred already?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Look, the administration has taken daring actions for the previous a number of months for the reason that Dobbs determination again in June. They usually have made a precedence to make it possible for we defend ladies’s well being one of the best ways that we will from the federal authorities. They’ve made that dedication.
You’ve heard from Jen Klein many occasions right here on the podium. She’s been on the podium twice — the
Common [Gender] Coverage Council director — on the — on the actions that we now have taken and the way we’re going to proceed to make it possible for we maintain that entrance of thoughts, ensuring that we don’t — we don’t overlook the ladies who’re placing — you understand, whose lives at the moment are in danger due to the Dobbs determination.
So, look, on the identical time, the President has been clear that the one technique to — to essentially defend ladies’s well being is to codify Roe. And so, that’s one thing that you just’re going to listen to from this President right this moment, you’re going to listen to from the Vice President as nicely.
And the Vice President has led on this effort. She has met with, you understand, I might most likely argue, a whole bunch of native officers and has spoken to this throughout the nation and made the voice of the administration very clear on this.
So, look, you understand, we — we’ve been very clear: It’s restricted on what we will do on the federal stage. The President has been clear on this.
However we — the best way that we get to an answer right here, that we make it possible for these tough selections that ladies should make — the potential of contraception being on the — on the chopping block and privateness and — being in danger, and marriage equality being additionally in danger, as we’re seeing from Republican officers and what they’re saying and what they’re alluding to that they are going to do subsequent. We have now SCOTUS that’s again, as someone was asking me — the actions that they’ll significantly take — doubtlessly take. We consider in defending the basic rights and freedoms of People. And we’re going to do every part that we will to make that occur.
Q And actual fast on gasoline costs. You alluded to a number of the steps that have been taken to drive gasoline costs down. Now that they’re going again up, is the White Home assured that it has the coverage instruments remaining to drive these costs again down? Or are all the nice choices primarily exhausted at this level?
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So, look, once more, we’re going to do every part that we will right here within the administration to decrease prices for People. That’s going to proceed to be a primary precedence, particularly as we take a look at the President’s financial plan.
We’re persevering with to launch oil from Strategic Petroleum Reserve by November. That has not stopped; that continues.
Because the President, as we all know, introduced that pa- — this previous — previous spring, we’re persevering with to interact straight with business to make sure that the personal sector can be doing every part it could actually to construct resilience forward of the approaching season. We all know winter — winter is right here.
And on Friday, the President workforce met with vitality firms and emphasised that vitality firms with document excessive earnings, document excessive exports, and document low invent- — inventories should step up and convey down the costs on the pump.
He’s been very clear. You heard him say that final week. The President and his senior workforce are straight engaged on these points. And once more, will probably be — it can proceed to be — reducing costs for People — a ty- — a prime financial precedence for this administration.
Q Thanks, Karine.
MS. JEAN-PIERRE: All proper. Thanks, all people.
2:44 P.M. EDT